prikaz prve stranice dokumenta FRP Pedestrian Bridges-Analysis of Different Infill Configurations
  Download
PDF 71.4 MB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
FRP Pedestrian Bridges-Analysis of Different Infill Configurations
Buildings, 11(11) (2021); 564. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11110564
Stepinac, Lucija; Skender, Ana; Damjanović, Domagoj; Galić, Josip

Cite this document

Stepinac, L., Skender, A., Damjanović, D. & Galić, J. (2021). FRP Pedestrian Bridges-Analysis of Different Infill Configurations. Buildings, 11(11).. doi: 10.3390/buildings11110564

Stepinac, Lucija, et al. "FRP Pedestrian Bridges-Analysis of Different Infill Configurations." Buildings, vol. 11(11), 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11110564

Stepinac, Lucija, Ana Skender, Domagoj Damjanović and Josip Galić. "FRP Pedestrian Bridges-Analysis of Different Infill Configurations." Buildings 11(11) (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11110564

Stepinac, L., et al. (2021) 'FRP Pedestrian Bridges-Analysis of Different Infill Configurations', Buildings, 11(11). doi: 10.3390/buildings11110564

Stepinac L, Skender A, Damjanović D, Galić J. FRP Pedestrian Bridges-Analysis of Different Infill Configurations. Buildings [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 September 10];11(11). doi: 10.3390/buildings11110564

L. Stepinac, A. Skender, D. Damjanović and J. Galić, "FRP Pedestrian Bridges-Analysis of Different Infill Configurations", Buildings, vol. 11(11), 2021. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:237:889087. [Accessed: 10 September 2024]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (english)FRP Pedestrian Bridges-Analysis of Different Infill Configurations
AuthorLucija Stepinac
AuthorAna Skender
AuthorDomagoj Damjanović
AuthorJosip Galić
Author's institutionUniversity of Zagreb
Faculty of Civil Engineering
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		TECHNICAL SCIENCES
Civil Engineering
Abstract (english)
The main aim of this study is to analyze fiber- reinforced polymer (FRP) bridge decks according to their material, cross-section, and shape geometry. Infill cell configurations of the decks (rectangular, triangular, trapezoidal, and honeycomb) were tested based on the FRP cell units available in the market. A comparison was made for each cell configuration in flat and curved bridge shapes. Another comparison was made between the material properties. Each model was computed for a composite layup material and a quasi-isotropic material. The quasi-isotropic material represents chopped fibers within a matrix. FE (finite element) analysis was performed on a total of 24 models using Abaqus software. The results show that the bridge shape geometry and infill configuration play an important role in increasing the stiffness, more so than improving the material properties. The arch shape of the bridge deck with quasi-isotropic material and chopped fibers was compared to the cross-ply laminate material in a flat bridge deck. The results show that the arch shape of the bridge deck contributed to the overall stiffness by reducing the deformation by an average of 30–40%. The results of this preliminary study will provide a basis for future research into form finding and laboratory testing.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review - international
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleBuildings
Numberingvol. 11(11), 564
e-ISSN2075-5309
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11110564
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:237:889087
Publication2021
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2024-09-04 18:30:57